Development News for Falls, Pennsylvania

Shift from Warehouse to Data Center Approval Causes Resident Confusion and Lack of Transparency Concerns

During the public comment period, a resident expressed concerns about the conversion of the proposed project from warehouses to a data center. They believed that the initial understanding was that Amazon would be building warehouses, and the change to a data center was not transparently communicated, leading many residents to feel blindsided. This resident initiated a petition that quickly gathered significant support. The resident also highlighted the difference in impact between a warehouse and a data center, emphasizing the need for full transparency.

Residents Press Board for Action on Traffic Safety Improvements Amidst Slow Implementation

Residents, particularly Margaret Marino, expressed frustration regarding the slow progress and lack of clear implementation timelines for traffic safety improvements discussed at previous meetings. Marino followed up on a preliminary report concerning "399 Form Ridge" that was expected by May 1st but was not received. The report was discussed by the Traffic Advisory Committee, which provided additional recommendations. Residents are concerned about specific improvements like three-way stop signs, raised lane markers, and additional pavement markings, and questioned when these would be implemented. The board acknowledged receiving the report and recommendations, noting that some recommendations are easier to implement than others, such as stop signs. The most significant decision point for the board is the potential installation of speed humps, which involves policy considerations due to potential neighborhood requests and opposition from the fire marshal. The board indicated they would discuss the recommendations in executive session and then publicly, with potential votes at the next meeting.

Diesel Turbines for Data Center Raise Pollution, Health, and Water Quality Concerns

A resident raised concerns about the proposed use of four diesel turbines to power the data center, citing potential environmental pollution. This resident also noted that the area received an 'F' for air quality and highlighted cancer clusters in Westchester linked to similar turbine operations. Furthermore, the resident mentioned that New Jersey is stopping data centers and impacting water quality, expressing concern about the potential effects on water and air when recycled water is used. The resident plans to submit a right-to-know request for information about the land ownership, Amazon's involvement (purchase or lease), and tax details related to the data center.

Data Center Location on Contaminated Site and Notification Methods Questioned

During public comment, a resident raised concerns about the proposed data center, particularly its location on a former US Steel site that was allegedly contaminated. This resident stated that the site was approved for industrial warehouses but was quickly overturned and changed to a data center in a single meeting. There was also discussion about the effectiveness of public notification methods, with some arguing that social media and online advertising are insufficient and that mailings should have been sent to all residents, including seniors who may not use social media. Officials countered that the project was advertised through required channels and that multiple public meetings had occurred.