Development News for Holbrook, Massachusetts

Site Plan Approved for Shooting Range Expansion at 148 Center Street

The Planning Board approved the site plan review for 148 Center Street, allowing Frank Duggan to construct a 15 by 40-foot addition to his building to expand the shooting range. The addition will be located at the rear of the building, extending into an existing paved parking and storage area, thus not increasing impervious surfaces or affecting drainage. The construction involves a steel shell with ballistic rubber for safety, noise reduction, and lead dust containment, exceeding current safety standards. The board confirmed the use is permitted and consistent with the industrial zoning, and noted that noise levels are expected to be minimal. The approval is for the site plan aspects, with the understanding that the use is already established [cite: 1591-1786].

Basement Renovation for Family Support Living Approved at 27 Worcester Place

The Planning Board approved Edwin De La Cruz's request for a special permit to renovate his basement at 27 Worcester Place for family support living. The renovated area, totaling 494 square feet, will include a living area, bedroom, and kitchen. The board noted that the area exceeds the typical 600 sq ft limit for family support living but found it acceptable. The permit is tied to the current owner and would require reapplication if ownership changes. The board found the plans satisfactory and the request met necessary criteria [cite: 1465-1585].

Holbrook Planning Board Denies Certificate of Performance for 1 Kellaway Drive Covenant

The Planning Board discussed the request for a certificate of performance for 1 Kellaway Drive regarding a covenant requiring a paved emergency access road to the railroad. The Fire Chief reported that constructing such access would be challenging due to site conditions but noted a potential pedestrian access point at 270 Center Street. Town counsel advised that covenants over 30 years old are generally unenforceable. The board determined the request was premature as the covenant's requirements had not been met, and therefore voted to deny the certificate of performance. The applicant and property owner indicated they would explore other options, potentially including legal action or title insurance claims [cite: 21-164].

Residents Express Strong Opposition to 16 Martins Lane Communications Tower

During the discussion for the 16 Martins Lane Communications Tower, residents voiced strong opposition due to concerns about the tower's placement in a residential neighborhood, its visual impact, potential health effects, and the height of the structure. They questioned the applicant's demonstration of need and the exploration of alternative sites. The board emphasized its role in evaluating compliance with regulations and the applicant's burden of proof, noting that alternative sites in commercial or industrial areas should be prioritized. The peer review process aims to validate the applicant's claims and explore alternatives [cite: 237-804].