Development News for Ludlow, Massachusetts

Oak Tree Removal on Stevens Drive Deemed Outside Wetland Jurisdiction

A complaint was received regarding the removal of a large oak tree on Stevens Drive. Upon inspection, only the stump remained. The tree appeared to be more than 100 feet from Havland Pond, a jurisdictional wetland resource area. The tree company stated the homeowner believed a permit had been obtained. While the distance from the pond suggests no wetland impact, measurements indicated the tree might have been as close as 101 feet. The commission noted that without proof of a permit or a clear violation within the 100-foot buffer zone, no further action can be taken. The incident has led to a neighborhood dispute [cite: 227-266].

In-ground Pool Request at 125 Watson Lane Requires Further Review

Nicholas Gogan requested a determination for an in-ground pool at 125 Watson Lane. The proposed pool is approximately 73 feet from the wetlands. Gogan detailed plans for silt fencing, a curtain drain, and a saltwater sanitizing system to minimize chemical use. The commission determined that a Request for Determination (RDA) must be filed, with a ruling to occur at the July 1st meeting. The applicant was advised to submit a narrative and map detailing the project, including the proposed drainage solutions [cite: 7-19, 46-48, 67-71, 103-106].

Overgrown Wetland Buffer Area on Fuller Street Requires DPW and Potential RDA Action

Michael Graham inquired about clearing an overgrown area on his property at 229 Fuller Street, which borders Harrisbrook. This area was planted with native wetland plants in 2002 as part of an addition to his house and is now overgrown with vines and brush. The area includes a permanent right-of-way for the DPW. Graham is concerned about maintaining the area, which has become difficult due to invasive species and overgrowth, partly exacerbated by DPW clearing of trees along the brook several years ago. The commission advised contacting the DPW first to clear their easement, and if further work is needed on his property, he should file an RDA [cite: 122-148, 150-153, 157-163, 180-181, 184-189].