Development News for Middle Smithfield, Pennsylvania

Township Considers Advance Payment for Emergency Needs

During the public comment period, a resident inquired about the possibility of an early release of taxpayer money for emergency purposes. The board discussed the upcoming bill list for June 10th, where the entire amount owed would be released. The resident suggested a small advance, providing a percentage of the total amount due to cover immediate needs, referencing potential penalties for late payments on loans. The board agreed to review the resident's email to determine a reasonable dollar amount for an advance.

Township Pursues Multiple Grants and Community Development Projects

The Middle Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors discussed ongoing grant applications and community development initiatives. This included progress on the revitalized 209 grant for the Presbyterian Church bell repair, ratification of a grant submission for Main Street beautification and litter control, and consideration of a grant for holiday decorations. Additionally, four projects were reviewed for the revitalized 209 committee, encompassing business facade improvements, paving, landscaping, and building maintenance.

Middle Smithfield Township Receives Two Local Share Account Grants

The Middle Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors acknowledged receipt of two Local Share Account (LSA) grants from Monroe County. One grant of $50,000 is allocated for planning, which will fund a new township map and planning/design work for a downtown district. The second grant supports the Bushkill Volunteer Fire Company in renovating their fire station and emergency shelter. The township is awaiting word on state LSA grants.

Township Reviews Bids for FOB, Seal Coat Materials and Services

The Middle Smithfield Township Board of Supervisors reviewed bids for FOB and seal coat materials. Eureka Stone submitted the sole bid for FOB and seal coat materials. Their bid included line items for approximate quantities of materials, with unit prices and totals. The board also reviewed historical bid data from the previous year for comparison. Separately, Midland Asphalt and AMS submitted bids for seal coat services, with Midland Asphalt having a lower total bid.