Development News for St. Augustine, Florida

Defunct PUD Rezoning Recommended to Restore Residential and General Office Zoning

The board recommended approval to the City Commission for a rezoning request at 65 Lewis Boulevard, changing the zoning from a defunct Planned Unit Development (PUD) back to its previous designations of Residential and General Office (RGZO) landward of the most restrictive jurisdictional line, and Open Land (OOL) waterward. This is considered a 'housekeeping' measure to update the zoning to reflect the current, compatible uses, as the PUD has been defunct for a significant period. The board noted that property owners have a right to apply for straight zoning compatible with the area's development.

Historic Theater Revitalization Approved with Variances for Parking and Setbacks

The board approved a comprehensive rezoning and variance request for a historic property at 82, 84, and 86 Washington Street, intended to be revitalized as a theater venue by Paul and Becky Morris. The request included a use by exception for a theater, sale of alcohol (under 14% ABV), and off-site parking. Variances were sought for reduced parking (17 to 6 spaces) and a zero front yard setback for a historic stair access. The applicants emphasized the project's historical significance, community revitalization goals, and minimal impact. Numerous letters of support were received, and the board approved the application with conditions on outdoor music hours and food truck operations.

Screen Enclosure Variance Approved for Pool Access Amidst Health Concerns

The board approved a variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet for a proposed screen enclosure over a swimming pool. The applicant, Elizabeth Lynn Nyberg, cited personal health issues and her husband's mobility challenges as the reasons for needing adequate space around the pool for exercise and safe access. The property is located in the Madeira PUD and backs onto a vacant, unplatted forested area, which is a conservation easement. Board members noted that the proposed enclosure would not be directly adjacent to another backyard, and given the location and the applicant's circumstances, they approved the variance.

Accessory Dwelling Variance Request Continued Due to Missing Information

The board heard a request for a variance to reduce rear and side yard setbacks and increase lot coverage for a 570 sq ft accessory structure. The applicant, Brandy Holland, explained that an existing structure was demolished due to its poor condition, and the new structure's placement is intended to be complimentary to neighbors. Concerns were raised about missing information, including updated site plans with a pool and lot coverage calculations. The applicant mentioned purchasing additional property that would bring the lot coverage under the required limit, but this had not yet been processed in tax records. The board requested additional information, including an updated survey and a site plan showing the pool and its relation to the proposed building. The item was continued.